Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a subscription to continue reading.
We have used your information to see if you have a subscription with us, but did not find one. Please use the button below to verify an existing account or to purchase a new subscription.
Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. Please use the button below to manage your account.
Verify your print or online subscription account here. Full week print subscribers are entitled to FREE unlimited online and eEdition access through Connersville News Examiner All-Access.
Verify your print or online subscription account here. Full week print subscribers are entitled to FREE unlimited online and eEdition access through Connersville News Examiner All-Access.
The $900 billion fiscal stimulus approved by congressional leaders late Sunday, and now headed for speedy enactment, is, like the accompanying funding deal to avert a government shutdown, more than a little underwhelming. Not just because it’s a shadow of the multi-trillion-dollar CARES Act approved last spring. Not just because both Democrats and President Donald Trump wanted to spend substantially more. Or even that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell counseled against a too-small second stimulus causing a “weak” recovery. But simply because in this almost unparalleled circumstance of a pandemic, “throwing money” at the problem is exactly the right thing to do.
It amounts to taxpayers borrowing from their future selves to keep afloat in the months ahead. Better to keep people on the job, in their homes and feeding their families in 2021 than in more dire circumstances.
Commented
Sorry, there are no recent results for popular commented articles.